Most American species are genetically modified corn, the fact that even the anti-GM who can not be denied. So they spread rumors that change: the United States are genetically modified corn planted as feed and industrial useChristian Louboutin uk, people do not eat. Such as the United States, South Dakota State University, Biology and Microbiology professor Yan Yang in the Southern Weekend article, "GM dispute the nature and context," say the same, that sweet corn, vegetables, these can be directly made food "basically did not grow genetically modified varieties." . They cited "a grocer (Kraft Foods) inadvertently protein-containing transgenic insect-resistant corn flour mixed with the feed of ordinary corn meal, in order to settle the matter, grocer's shelves only large-scale recovery of corn flakes." example.
Let's look at the corn flakes recycling event how it was. U.S. geneticallyChristian Louboutin shoes modified corn variety for human consumption in most of the standard was approved for marketing, and only one is limited to only when the feed. Later, the corn (trade name Starlink corn) were found to flow into the fast-food market, is removed, so now the United States are genetically modified corn for human consumption. Of course, the United States, genetically modified corn and non-GM maize, as most are used as feed and industrial use, a small part for human consumption. The United States are not required to mark transgenic and non-food genetically modified corn for human consumption, how many of GM's difficult to have accurate data. As long as the United States, not 100% corn are Tory Burch saleplanted genetically modified corn, anti-GM claim that people can feel for people to eat all non-GM maize.But we can justify using two genetically modified corn Americans eat.
The first reason is indirect. United States is difficult to control species of corn as feed or as food, feed approved Starlink corn only do Shangju into the food market, not to mention those approved for human consumption of genetically modified corn.The second reason is straightforward. There is a corn variety called sweet corn, the variety of corn is almost 100% for people not to eat directly processed Tory Burch sale(cooked corn on the cob, corn kernels are basically the species). So there is no genetically modified sweet corn in it? Professor Yan granted that "basically." In fact, genetically modified sweet corn in the U.S. market are plenty. The first Bt transgenic sweet corn developed by Novartis
Seeds, on February 27, 1998 approved for commercial cultivation, trade names Attribute, the Rogers Sales usa/Novartis/N1828.htm). Attribute on the market there are several varieties of sweet corn sales (such as BC 0805, WH0809, GH0851, GSS0966, BSS0977, BSS0982, WSS0987), breed directory also stressed how they taste delicious Syngenta seed companies developed Bt transgenic sweet corn Bt-11, also in 1998, grown commercially in the United States approved in the United States, Canada, South Africa, Argentina and Japan have grown, and exported to Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand, Philippines, South Korea Jimmy Choo Salen_update_3-04_final.pdf). Monsanto also announced that this year will be launched in the U.S. genetically modified sweet maize varieties competition in the market.
Since the FDA does not require genetically modified foods do special signs, which have been genetically modified sweet corn Americans unknowingly eat up. Americans, even in informed, not afraid to eat genetically modified sweet corn. There are tests showed that the genetically modified sweet corn and made a note on the non-GM sweet corn with the sale, the sale of genetically modified sweet mbt shoes salecorn can still share accounted for 44% In addition, the vegetables in the United States is genetically modified varieties that Monsanto's genetically modified virus resistant squash, which is for direct human consumption.You to oppose genetically modified crops is your right, but at least not rely on rumors to counter.
corn Americans unknowingly
September 14th, 2011 at 03:54 pm
September 14th, 2011 at 03:56 pm 1316015795
Let's look at the corn flakes recycling event how it was. U.S. geneticallyChristian Louboutin shoes modified corn variety for human consumption in most of the standard was approved for marketing, and only one is limited to only when the feed. Later, the corn (trade name Starlink corn) were found to flow into the fast-food market, is removed, so now the United States are genetically modified corn for human consumption. Of course, the United States, genetically modified corn and non-GM maize, as most are used as feed and industrial use, a small part for human consumption. The United States are not required to mark transgenic and non-food genetically modified corn for human consumption, how many of GM's difficult to have accurate data. As long as the United States, not 100% corn are Tory Burch saleplanted genetically modified corn, anti-GM claim that people can feel for people to eat all non-GM maize.But we can justify using two genetically modified corn Americans eat.
The first reason is indirect. United States is difficult to control species of corn as feed or as food, feed approved Starlink corn only do Shangju into the food market, not to mention those approved for human consumption of genetically modified corn.The second reason is straightforward. There is a corn variety called sweet corn, the variety of corn is almost 100% for people not to eat directly processed Tory Burch sale(cooked corn on the cob, corn kernels are basically the species). So there is no genetically modified sweet corn in it? Professor Yan granted that "basically." In fact, genetically modified sweet corn in the U.S. market are plenty. The first Bt transgenic sweet corn developed by Novartis
Seeds, on February 27, 1998 approved for commercial cultivation, trade names Attribute, the Rogers Sales usa/Novartis/N1828.htm). Attribute on the market there are several varieties of sweet corn sales (such as BC 0805, WH0809, GH0851, GSS0966, BSS0977, BSS0982, WSS0987), breed directory also stressed how they taste delicious Syngenta seed companies developed Bt transgenic sweet corn Bt-11, also in 1998, grown commercially in the United States approved in the United States, Canada, South Africa, Argentina and Japan have grown, and exported to Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand, Philippines, South Korea Jimmy Choo Salen_update_3-04_final.pdf). Monsanto also announced that this year will be launched in the U.S. genetically modified sweet maize varieties competition in the market.
Since the FDA does not require genetically modified foods do special signs, which have been genetically modified sweet corn Americans unknowingly eat up. Americans, even in informed, not afraid to eat genetically modified sweet corn. There are tests showed that the genetically modified sweet corn and made a note on the non-GM sweet corn with the sale, the sale of genetically modified sweet mbt shoes salecorn can still share accounted for 44% In addition, the vegetables in the United States is genetically modified varieties that Monsanto's genetically modified virus resistant squash, which is for direct human consumption.You to oppose genetically modified crops is your right, but at least not rely on rumors to counter.